Source Notes
Source method
Facts, signals, and conclusions stay separate
Model specifications and prices prefer official sources; rankings retain their original source and time; community discussions remain public signals; no record does not mean safe, good, or controversy-free.
Evidence sources
Source types
| Type | Use | |
|---|---|---|
| Official sources | Vendor websites, API docs, model cards, technical reports, and official repositories. | |
| Independent public metrics | Open rankings or metrics such as LMArena, Artificial Analysis, OpenRouter, and Hugging Face Trending. | |
| Community public signals | Openable Reddit posts, GitHub Issues, and Hugging Face Discussions. | |
| Media and reviews | Media, blogs, and reviews are used only as supplementary leads. |
Field states
How unavailable public information is shown
| State | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Not disclosed | The public source does not disclose this field. |
| No reliable public source | No open, checkable public source is currently available. |
| Needs confirmation | Available sources conflict, or the date or target is not yet clear. |
| Not applicable | The field does not apply to this model or tool. |
Public sources
What each source can tell you
| Source | Use | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| OpenRouter | Pricing, context, availability, and weekly heat | Represents OpenRouter only, not total-market usage. |
| Hugging Face | Model pages, downloads, likes, Spaces, and discussions | Downloads use a rolling window; likes and Spaces are point-in-time snapshots. |
| GitHub | Public tool and repository issues | An issue is a discussion or problem record, not automatically a model-risk or reputation conclusion. |
| Public post snapshots | Only openable snapshots are shown; they do not represent the whole community. | |
| X / Chinese communities | Not currently included | The site does not infer overall sentiment from their absence. |